Gabriel Massip Fons schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> How does compare 200 2.8L + 1,4x + 2.0x (not simultaneously) versus the
> 100-400 L IS?
>
Don't know about the 100-400 L IS. The 200 + 1.4x gives still decent quality,
with the old 2x picture quality really suffers. But this might be better with the
new 2x, which is supposed to be better than the old model.
Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************