"Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski" wrote:
> I agree: the 200mm f/2,8L does give decent quality with the Extender
> EF2x but rather not with the 2x.
FWIW, I would disagree (I have gotten better than decent results with the EF 2x
extender,
although it's not my first choice); but of course neither of us knows what the other
considers "decent."
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
