At 03:11 PM 8/17/01 , F. Craig Callahan wrote:
>Given current prices, the Canon FS4000 would seem a better value than the
>Nikon
>LS-40 (4000 ppi vs. 2900 ppi, although the Nikon wins in dynamic
>range: 3.6 vs.
>3.4). The Nikon, like the Minolta Scan Dual II, offers only a USB
>connection (so
>it appears) whereas the Canon offers both USB and SCSI, which could be a plus
>for some.
If Nikon still has problems with noisy shadows when scanning print film,
then their dynamic range doesn't mean squat. My LS-30 suffers badly from
it. Not sure about the LS-2000.
Devin
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
