-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrance Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Hi Gary,
>
>I recently bought a new 70-200mm 2.8L without the IS. I knew that the IS
>version was hitting the streets at the time I was about to purchase. I've
>been taking some pictures using handholding at bright light conditions and
>IS seems to be a moot point for this particular lens.
Hi Lawrance:
I offered the hypothetical question of "why the 70-200 IS" a while back too,
as the regular 70-200 is neither a slow nor particularly long lens so would
the IS feature be of substantial benefit? A lot of people thought it would
apparently as plenty are eager to shell out the kind of dough it's going to
cost.
Gary Russell
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
