In a message dated 9/8/01 1:01:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Users who shoot negative film will get good results out of any of the three
cameras reviewed here, though the EOS3 would be most likely to give a bit
more colour saturation due to increased exposure."
"Experienced transparency users would probably be best advised to
choose the F5-but watch out for flat lighting...that will make some frames
look worse than those from the other two cameras.."
These results were echoed in a three-way test between F5, Dynax 9 and EOS1v
in the UK magazine "Amateur Photographer" in late 2000.
>>
I guess that's why many people use a handheld meters, like Minolta and
Sekonic, that proved over the years to be very accurate, while in camera
meters are often good - just not as good.
George
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
