I had posted the link to photo.net
(http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001e5A ) and somebody
responded to it with this link:
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&page=1&message=1506873
http://www.cox-internet.com/dpennybaker/comparison10.jpg
http://www.cox-internet.com/dpennybaker/comparison12.jpg
this one shows that the IS inferior. Weird.. This seems to me like a bogus
test, with 28-135 being better then 70-200 almost, and mos of them look
exactly the same...
Comments?
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
