"Neil K." wrote: > > > I think a weather-sealed 28-105 2.8L that didn't contract or expand > when zooming would be a pretty darn popular lens. >
I don't think so. I guess it would cost $2500+ which would lessen it's popularity slightly. :-( Thomas Bantel * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
