I strongly suggest you check out Lowepro's Pro Mag 2 before making a decision...My setup was very much like yours and it worked beautifully, though now I have switched up to a 300/2.8 IS and the bag can still hold 70-200/2.8, 300/2.8, Body, a wide angle zoom, and 100 macro, plus some other stuff. It stores the lenses vertically
Note the internal dimensions listed on the low pro website for this bag are conservative in rating interior height. The bag comes with about 1.5 inches of padding in the bottom in 3 different sheets...nice, but overkill. I took out the 1 inch thick low density pad to make extra room, leaving the 1/2 inch thick high density foam...then I could store my 300/4 with my eos 3 mounted on it in the bag, even with a filter or two. Very nice setup...comes with a nice padded shoulder strap and a waist belt to lower the burden on your shoulder if you want. You can put several lens case, water bottle, film pack etc on the expansion loops on the outside of the bag as well. Mike Pattie Anderson wrote: > > I have outgrown my old camera bag, and I am looking for some recommendations > for a new one. I'd prefer a shoulder bag (vs. a daypack/backpack), and need > room for 2 EOS bodies (EOS-3 and my old Rebel 2000), two long L-series > telephoto lenses (70-200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 with hoods), one or two smaller > lenses, a flash unit, a point and shoot digital camera, filters, film, etc., > and ideally, a little extra room so I can still use it if I get more > equipment in the future. > > Any suggestions? Thanks! > > Pattie -- Michael Shupe M.J.Shupe Photography Michigan Tech University www.northernlightsgallery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
