"F. Craig Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keep in mind that the digital sensor in a digital SLR is not interchangeable
> either. You'll pay a lot of money and be stuck with the sensor it comes with--in
> other words, the digital images you get from a current digital SLR will never be
> better than the day you take it out of the box (and older models will have the
> same limitation).
This is not 100% acurate. You get firmware updates which indeed improve
image quality.
> but with film you will be able to get
> ever-better digital images over time as scanner technology improves.
I really hope for affordable batch scanners.
> I disagree; ultimately it's the lens that makes the image and even with an older
> body you will enjoy the results of good glass.
I also had this experience. When I compare my EOS 600 shots taken
with my Tamron 20-200 with the shots taken with my EF 135mm/2.0L,
I see that the money saved an a cheap lens is wasted on bad pictures.
> "Gary A. Thurlow" wrote:
> > I am very concerned with price, but I hate paying film developing
> > charges.
Well, a Canon 1V is much more expensive than an RT.
--
Pawel Nabe Business: +49 / 30 / 245 54 920
PaN Super Sonic Software Service Private: +49 / 30 / 447 33 452
expert for hi tech & low budget Mobile: +49 / 171 / 267 54 63
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
