> From: Michael Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm going to use Kodachrome 200, so I'll have to wait longer than with > E-6. There's just something about Kodachrome though that makes it worth > the wait.
Michael: No offence meant here, but K200?? Now, I was a great booster of K14 films. I loved K25 to pieces and K64 was always as good as there was around next to it. They are still great films IMO . . .but K200?? I treied it with great expectations. Bought 4 rolls, used 2 and threw the other two away when I got the results. Certainly one of the grainiest films I have ever seen. I'd never use it again! Try Provia 100F pushed to ISO 200 instead. For that matter Provia 400F straight up at ISO 400 beats the pants off K200 too. In fact there isn't much out there that ISN'T better than K200! Sorry, it is O/T and outspoken but I can not fathom anyone using that terrible stuff in this day and age of fine grained E6 products. Sure, use the ISO 25 and 64 K14 films if you can tolerate the processing delays. But K200??? WHY??? What do you like about it? What could ANYBODY like about it? -- Terence A. Danks Nature & Wildlife Photography http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home.htm * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
