Comparing early K200 with later material, I've noticed an enormous improvement in grain. No announcement from Kodak as far as I can recall. And it's sharp on screen... and I use loads of Provia 100F so I know what modern films can do. I do like the tonality and smoothness of K25 & old KII though!
M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK ----- Original Message ----- From: T. Danks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:40 AM Subject: Re: My New EOS 3 > > From: Michael Fontana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I'm going to use Kodachrome 200, so I'll have to wait longer than with > > E-6. There's just something about Kodachrome though that makes it worth > > the wait. > > Michael: > No offence meant here, but K200?? > > Now, I was a great booster of K14 films. I loved K25 to pieces and K64 was > always as good as there was around next to it. They are still great films IMO . > . .but K200?? > > I treied it with great expectations. Bought 4 rolls, used 2 and threw the other > two away when I got the results. Certainly one of the grainiest films I have > ever seen. snip * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
