On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:23:03 -0800, you wrote: >The Mk II is sharper and less expensive than the original, >but the original is better built. That's the trade off.
Really? I've heard more than once that they're the same optical design. Not doubting you, just curious. Is there documentation of the changes? I have the first version, but have never shot with a Mk.II. Ken Durling Visit my new easier-to-browse PhotoSIG portfolio: http://www.photosig.com/browse.php?id=photographer:203 * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
