Tim Munro schrieb: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It made a huge difference. The problem was there was a shadow over the > face. > > Normally -1EV should have eliminated nearly all of that. In my case it did > > not. While it got a bit lighter, even at +0EV the CF14 still added fill > but > > what I needed was the flash to equal the sun thereby elimiinating the > > shadow. When I set CF14 to off, I was using -1 2/3 EV and it was perfect > > everytime........ > > Thanks Peter, but I don't quite understand the process. How did you > establish -1 2/3 EV (flash comp.) as the correct amount for your situation > after setting CF14 to off ? And why is it easier to work that way rather > than setting +1 2/3 EV (for example) with CF14 on ?
Probably experience and personal taste. Some like -1 or -1 1/2 EV better, Peter obviously prefers -1 2/3. As for CF14, he may have meant "on" instead of "off". Thomas Bantel * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
