> Are you sure there has been some change (other than just some smalled "bug > fixes")? I think that 3 stops is just marketing... Nikon claimed 3 stops of > reduction, so of course Canon had to match that. Or maybe it's just because > of the relatively shorter focal length.
Hi Hugo, I was just quoting the Canon spec, nothing more. Beware that the Nikon spec is a "relative" spec, not an absolute one. See this Nikon blurb, especially the table comparing the 80-400VR and the 100-400IS: http://www.nikon-euro.com/nikoneuro_en/faq/lens/en/FAQ_lens_en_02.htm Cheers Julian Loke * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
