On 31 Jul 02 at 13:40, Steve Traudt wrote: > Ok, this has probably been discussed in the past but I am new to Canon and > the IS lenses. > > I have the 28-135 IS and the 100-400 IS. > > Does it hurt, help or make no difference to leave IS engaged when on a > tripod? How about a mono-pod? > > Do these two lenses respond differently on a tripod, or is the system the > same regardless of what lens it is put on??
Below all the IS-related files on my homepage: http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/is_tripo.htm http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/is_selft.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/is_drain.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/is_monop.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eosisbul.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eosiserr.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_is.htm http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_is99.htm http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/iscf.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/isaf.htm -- Bye, Willem-Jan Markerink The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the inability to understand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
