----- Original Message ----- From: "Marius Sundbakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:28 PM Subject: RE: EOS 1n: still worthy?
> > >The EOS 3 while an excellent value simply cannot make this claim. The EOS 3 > >in the Canon body line-up is an entry level body like the EOS 5/A2E bodies > >it replaced. > > The EOS 3 is an entry level body? Hm. What do you consider EOS 300 or EOS 30/33 > then? ;-) I'd say EOS 3 is in the "middle"; "advanced amateur" or second > pro body, maybe. > An EOS 3 should do fine for most amateurs. In fact, anything more may just be > pretentious... > > > - Marius > I think what he meant was entry level pro camera body. I, myself, would make it an advanced amateur body, but that's just me. As far as the original question, I find the whistles and bells of my 1n to more than suffice for me, but then I view it as a slightly more complicated version of my A2, with better sealing. I tend to pull it out when I'm shooting at the beach or desert, the A2 gets most of its work around the studio and around town. I, too, view the 1v as a superb answer to a question no one asked. But I feel the same way about the 3 vs. the A2, more features than I need. Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
