Jack wrote:
When I said I would buy two, I meant to replace the two 28-135's I have precisely because they have IS! I know people will probably flame the hell out of me for saying this, but I am not nearly as happy with the 28-135(s) in terms of optical quality as I am with the 35-350. Not based on tests or anything, just based on use for weddings, landscape and wildlife (while my 300/2.8 was in the shop) in terms of the "pleasingness" of the images .If only it had IS, I would buy two (seriously).Mike I just fired up my D60 and 28-135 IS for some fall foliage shots. It is foggy and misty here and the shutter speed was 1/10th with ISO 100. Good, crisp shots. IS is my honey! Jack Casner
Mike
--
Michael Shupe
M.J.Shupe Photography
Michigan Tech University
www.northernlightsgallery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
