"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" schrieb:
> 
> Jack Casner wrote (edited):
> 
> > Two weeks ago I found a "bargain" on the 28-70mm L
> > and tried it on my camera.  Maybe I didn't spend enough
> > time examining the lens but it seemed no more robust
> > looking than my 28-135.
> >
> > As I say, this may be faulty observation on my part - I was
> > in a hurry - but I wasn't very impressed.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Jack,
> 
> Well said. Although I think you will need to get your teflon coated flame
> retardant suit ready as this is the holy grail of lenses for the advanced
> amateur. If you actually check out the resolution specs you will also find
> the 28-135mm quite comparable to the 28-135 IS optically in the mid
> apertures. If one needs F2.8 then there is little choice, but if one doesn't
> shoot wide open then the 28-135IS IMO is the best bet (except for Chip who
> prefers his 28-105mm. See Chip, saved you the trouble of replying).

The 28-70/2.8 L does certainly not have the same solid feel as e.g. the 
80-200/2.8 L. It has a little play in the lens barrel (at least my sample), 
although not as much as my 28-135. Now, if you actually check out the 
resolution specs, it seems really not overly impressive. Well, to compare
mid range apertures is a little like, hmmm, comparing a VW and a Ferrari
at 50 mph. The interesting thing is, the 28-70 is quite good at apertures
that mean wide open with the 28-135. And even at f/2.8 it's not really
a bad performer. 

Then, there are those things you won't see when you are in a hurry: Real 
world results. I'll put my flame proof suit on, I have to state I believe 
to see a difference beyond sharpness. Maybe it's the more vibrant colors 
or the infamous Leica glow, the pictures appear to look different when 
compared to my 28-135 or 28-105 (or my Sigma 28-70/2.8). 

Thomas Bantel
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to