Paul Moortgat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > Now it's even more difficult: I discovered a Sigma 15 mm Fisheye for > 535 Euro. Is this even better to have a wide angle lens. It's just for > panoramic pictures via my D60.
Paul, Someone I trust on rec.photo.equipment.35mm tested the Sigma 15mm fisheye versus the Canon EF 15mm fisheye and found no optical difference that he could tell. Do be aware of what a fisheye lens produces: a 180 degree photo with distortions all through, except for the middle axis. See Canon 15mm fisheye examples here: http://www.photo.net/canon/15-fisheye Quite different from the rectilinear lenses, 14mm and 16-35 and 17-35 and 20-35. Hope this helps, Bill Jameson * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
