----- Original Message ----- From: "Manny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:44 PM Subject: Re: ADMIN: Quote-order (was: Help with a "new" EOS-1Ds
...Lets get back to the important stuff; like the way CANON seems to have > squeezed us into updating to a minor improvement-- the D10.... This is continuing sound commercial judgement from Canon. The D60 was a small but significant step from the D30. Many D30 owners upgraded. Others saw the D60 as the first acceptable entry in to digital, especially those already committed to Canon lenses. In production terms there was little difference. The D60 was in short supply for most of it's (short) life. The D10(?) will represent a similar small but significant step. Often, this is the nature of commerce. Look back at older Canon cameras: for example, the FTB became the FTBn, the AE1 was replaced by the AE1 Program. Would you gripe as much if it were called the D60n? Like all users, I would like a camera that will work forever, cost next to nothing and deliver stunning quality, but I wouldn't want to be a shareholder of the company that produces it. CraigZ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
