"Mr. Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to: >> It's only too apparent from others'contributions that it's no good hoping the film >> savings will pay for it all... > > >But that's what you tell your wife!
Well, in less than one month I'm up to shot number 550 something on the 10D. That'd be, let's see, 22 rolls of 24. I saved $240 bucks or so, not counting 4 by 6 prints of each, just negs and film... Imagine the time I saved not scanning and going to the lab though :-) But my recent spending of $800 on a computer upgrade was due anyway :-) As to printing, I'm going to be getting most prints made now at the lab anyway, so cost there is the same. Sadly, my inkjets of a few months back are showing fading already. Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
