On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:04:11 +0200 (CEST), EOS-Digest wrote: >Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:40:07 +0900 >From: Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Re: EOS 10D RAW files > >I love the way I can adjust a RAW image though. If I didn't have this >ability, digital would not be for me, at least not for shooting >nature, which I seem to be doing mostly.
Beg pardon (and this is a genuine question), but how did you do this back in the days when you were using slides? Didn't the shot have to be "spot on" then either, with hardly any ability to change the outcome afterwards? Maybe I haven't looked at RAW enough yet (ok, I know I haven't), but what major advantages can I gain with it besides setting the white balance afterwards? And set against the disadvantages of more work, less storage space and longer write-times? What's there still left to set on the camera if you can change everything afterwards anyway? Bye, Marc ----------------------------------- CrystalVisions Photography, Bonaire www.VisionsOfBonaire.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
