Pierre Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
That may be true, but pictures taken with my 17-40L and 100-400L are sharper than those taken with my 28-135 on my EOS 10D.
Is it because the 28-135 doesn't outperform the resolving capacity of the 10D's sensor?
Geez, Pierre, and I was thinking of getting a 28-135. Perhaps your example isn't up to snuff? I have seen results pretty darned good from it.
The 28-135 is certainly a fine lens - for a consumer zoom. When used stopped down a bit it is capable of very good results. It is no L zoom or prime lens, though. And a 10D with it's small sensor is a challenge to every lens designed for 35mm format.
Thomas Bantel
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
