Apparently, you are more interested in capturing the action, than in image quality. That's not a bad thing, just a choice.
Mr. Bill
Kenneth M. Sarno wrote:
Btw, seems as a major difference between Kodak & Canon 1Ds chip is the absence vs presence of micro-lenses....which affects the use/image quality of wide-angle lenses....
I could be wrong as usual, but I suspect that the 14mp Kodak Pro/c will have a negligible market impact compared with either one of the more expensive Canon 1Ds and the lower-resolution 1D Mk II.
I'm trying to figure out who the target buyer is for the Kodak, and having a difficult time.
Personally I didn't even consider spending my $4500 on 14 dog-slow flimsy megapixels from Kodak/Sigma rather than 8 rapid-fire armored-tank megapixels from Canon.
Therefore I'm guessing the Pro/c won't exert very much downward price pressure on anything but itself. Too bad.
--Ken S.
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
