I think it would depend upon which OS you're using on your desktop, as not all of them support 4Gb FAT volumes, some of them stop at 2.5Gb.
Tom P. > > If the size of the disk/card isl > 2GB, and cluster > size is 64K, why not use FAT instead of FAT32 ? It > should be a bit faster, if that small a performance > factor is important anyways ? > > - Harman * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
