[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote/replied to: >I want to buy an 135 L f/2 and thought if investing in a good prime why not >buy the Canon 1,4 converter that is especially made to work together with >(also) this lens. Is this a stupid thought (if the Kenko is the same >quality)?
why not just buy the 70-200L quality and long end would be about the same but you get more zoom and no converter needed Most folks who buy the 135 are rich enough to not worry about saving a bit of cash on a teleconverter, but likely most who get this lens get it for a specific purpose and don't use a teleconverter on it at all. The problem is that the ultimate sharpness is lost using a teleconverter on such a fabulously sharp lens. And if that's the case, might as well have a zoom. -- Need a brighter headlight the safe way? Get a MOTORCYCLE HEADLIGHT RELAY KIT at: http://ebeaver.oberro.com I'm a BMW rider and enthusiast Jim Davis * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
