On Monday June 21 2004 5:44 pm, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > WRONG, and you can't read, I guess. There HAVE BEEN compatibility issues > that I know of - maybe you don't. But that doesn't change the FACT that > there are some. > > Fred > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >-------------- > > And obviously you suffer from a convenient memory that cannot recall > the Tamron lens you allege had a problem. You cannot claim a fact > without proof. Â > Fred, a fact is something that actually exists. Since you cannot show > it exists it is NOT a fact. ÂHad you finished high school you > would have known this.
Peter, you're an ass. This has been a friendly list. Just because I don't remember what specific lens it was that failed, DOESN'T mean that it didn't happen. In particular since I did see the lens. And, last, I really don't give a flip whether you believe it or not. Fred -- "Ballmer is no more designed for the art of persuasion than the Abrams tank is for delivering meals on wheels." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
