--- "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Canon's new 28-300mm sounds like the ticket. Or if > that > is too pricey their older 28-200mm is a pretty > decent > lens. The 28-300 is undoubtedly a very good lens, but if my 28-70 isn't wide enough, the 28-300 isn't going to help in that respect, either. And it's certainly not what anyone would call "light." ===== Bob Meyer I wish I knew what I know now, when I was younger... http://www.meyerweb.net/epson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
