Yep. In that case, I agree with you. IFor most of the time, I have this fish eye and
28-135 in my bag. The 28-135 is used mostly and I LOVE the IS. I also have 75-300 from
sigma, which I bought for 300D and is surprisingly good optically, but mechanical
crap. :(. Use it when I really have to.
Regards,
Miha.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Meyer
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:04 PM
>
> --- Valencic Miha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why don't you buy Zenitar 16mm/2.8 fish eye?
> >
> > I use it my D30, EOS 30 (with manual ISO override),
> > and EOS3000.
> >
> > You can see a sample at
> > http://miha.magdalenice.net/temp/102_0213.jpg
> >
> > Regards,
> > Miha.
>
> Thanks for the reply. Actually, I already have one,
> and like it a lot when I really need w-i-d-e. However,
> my issue isn't with the wide end (17mm does fine for
> most of my work), but with the long end: 35 or 40mm
> isn't long enough, so neither the 17-35 or 17-40 works
> as an "all purpose" travel lens.
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
