> -----Original Message-----
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Meier
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin,
> Joe
> >
> > For the 10D a 1.6 crop sensor produces a 3000x2000 mpxl image  (6mp)
> > the 1dmkII a 1.3 crop sensor produces a 3400x2400 mpxl image (8mp)
the
> 
> > 1ds has a full size sensor and produces 11mp.
> 
> I am pretty sure the pixel pitch is different on all these sensors.
The
> 1Ds probably has the biggest pixel pitch which is a good thing.
----------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Austin,
Joe
> (IMS)
> 
> That is what I'm wondering about. I thought I remembered reading
> (although I can't remember where) that the pitch is the same on all
the
> current Canon cmos chips, it is just the size of sensor that generates
> the image size.  The notion is supported by the ratio of 6-8-11 which
is
> roughly inversely proportional to 1.6-1.3-1 .
> 
> Someone must know of an authoritative source on this.

>From my info:

1DS        : 8.8um x 8.8um, 23.8mm x 35.8mm, 4064x2704
1D         : 11.5um x 11.5um, 19.1mm x 28.7mm
1DmII      : 8.2um x 8.2um, 19.1mm x 28.7mm
10D & Rebel: 7.4um x 7.4 um, 15.1mm x 22.7mm, 3072x2048

So the pixel pitch varies from model to model which makes quite a bit of
sense.

Robert



*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to