> > >I guess I still don't believe the legitimacy of the web site in question. > > > >Ken > > > Well, here's a more reliable source: > > http://dpreview.com/articles/canoneos20d/ > >
Exactly, Ken, they list the sensor as 3504x2336 for 8.2 MP, not the much smaller 3000x2000 range quoted in the web site in question, interestingly there is no indication of what the RAW or the various .jpg file sizes are. And I think it's fair to assume the DPREVIEW information is much more believable based on track history. Ken (hopefully this doesn't become a Ken only thread....) * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
