> ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:15:49 -0700 > From: Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: EOS and now for something completely different... > > At 11:55 AM 9/20/2004, you wrote: > >Can I expect to see Canon launching a new pro film camera that will > >replace the EOS 3 and 1V (like Nikon just did with the F6)? > > > Since Canon plays their cards very close to the chest, I > doubt anyone can answer this. However, an interesting > question might be: how could the 1V be improved? IOW, why > would Canon even see the need to replace the 1V? Obviously > only experienced 1V users could answer this, which I am not, > but there are plenty here. > > Ken
Does this mean it's wishlist time? For the 1V Mark II <g>? I'd agree that there's not much to improve in the 1V . . . unless you start adding some digital features. First and foremost, let me shoot film, but give me a histogram. For that matter, let me JUST grab a histogram without exposing the film if I want to. I'd hope the sensor size needed to do that is small enough to make this doable. Next (but less technically likely) capture some low res jpeg index shots while we're at it. Number them to match the film frame. Paul Wasserman * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
