On 20 Sep 2004 at 16:56, Paul Wasserman wrote:
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:15:49 -0700
> > From: Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: EOS and now for something completely different...
> >
> > At 11:55 AM 9/20/2004, you wrote:
> > >Can I expect to see Canon launching a new pro film camera that will
> > >replace the EOS 3 and 1V (like Nikon just did with the F6)?
> >
> >
> > Since Canon plays their cards very close to the chest, I
> > doubt anyone can answer this. However, an interesting
> > question might be: how could the 1V be improved? IOW, why
> > would Canon even see the need to replace the 1V? Obviously
> > only experienced 1V users could answer this, which I am not,
> > but there are plenty here.
> >
> > Ken
>
> Does this mean it's wishlist time? For the 1V Mark II <g>?
>
> I'd agree that there's not much to improve in the 1V . . . unless you
> start adding some digital features.
>
> First and foremost, let me shoot film, but give me a histogram. For
> that matter, let me JUST grab a histogram without exposing the film if I
> want to. I'd hope the sensor size needed to do that is small enough to
> make this doable.
>
> Next (but less technically likely) capture some low res jpeg index shots
> while we're at it. Number them to match the film frame.
Anyone daring the bet that we will *never* see a combined digi+analog
camera?
By using another pellicle mirror system perhaps....shooting digi
normally, shooting analog alternatively or simultaneously for that
once in a lifetime shot....
I don't dare....:))
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
