Bill Gillooly wrote:
You'd think they could build a batch of parts, and only assemble a few lenses as demand required, just to meet a limited need.The cost to inventory the parts and assemble the lens would drive the cost even higher, significantly higher.
Also, the lack of depth of field at f/1.0 argument is specious, at best. I've you've got to shoot at f/1.0, what's better, little depth of field or no picture?
Mr. Bill
Small DOF would be better, but at what cost? IMHO, I don't think the lens was a "price performer" and those that bought it probably don't use it much.
Bob
* **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
