Julian Loke wrote: > If you are comparing focal lengths, below is what I feel is a > more equitable list. Do you agree?
> TS-E 24L <==> TS-E 45 > EF 24 f/2.8 <==> (EF 50 f/1.8) This seems a bit of a stretch ... wouldn't 35 mm be a better fit? In the case of the TS-E 24, this would give the TS-E 35 that many full-frame users have wished that Canon had carried over from the FD line. All of the TS-Es work surprisingly well with the 1.4x (and with the TS-E 90, even the 2x) extender. Using these lenses directly with the 1.6 crop factor, the angle of view is quite similar to the full-frame AoV using an extender. Optical performance probably is slightly better without the extender. Jeff Conrad * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
