If anyone is interested, just finished comparing the new Sigma 135-400
F4.5-5.6 DG lens against the Canon EF70-200mm F2.8L IS lens.  We used a
1D Mk II and took shots only at F8 at focal lengths of 135, 200, then
added a 2x on the 70-200 and did one at 300 and a last at 400. All shots
were with camera on tripod. Viewed the raw files on PS. Expected to see
the Sigma fair poorly but it did VERY well. This was a surprise to all
of use. At $599, if you can live without IS, it's a bargain for digital
that I would feel good to recommend. Plus its smaller and is well built
(metal not plastic). AF is not fast like USM but at $599 street price
not something I would worry about unless you are shooting NASCAR.

Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to