That 28-135 IS has to be one of the bargains of the last 10 years. I
love mine, too. recommend it highly. Well, one qualification
- watch out for straight lines near the edges of the frame at the
wide end. There's significant distortion. But honestly, I don't
notice unless the above applies. Of course, on a 350D it's going to
be a what? something like 45-200, at least in FOV. (let's get rid of
this "multiplier" idea) So it's no longer a w/a zoom, but still...
Ken
At 01:05 PM 3/15/2006, you wrote:
A couple of years ago I bought dirt cheap Sigma zoom (70-300 with Macro,
it is even APO I think). Used it on 300D, worked great.
The 28-135 IS, I use 'daily'. It is an allrounder for me and the IS is..
well, couldn't be without it. :)
Miha
> -----Original Message-----
> I have a young colleague with a few hundred quid burning a
> hole in his pocket and he has a 350D (Rebel XT) with an 18-55
> kit lens. He wants to buy his first 'telescopic' lens ;-)
>
SAMO NASLOVNIKU! / ONLY FOR THE INTENDED RECIPIENT!
To elektronsko sporocilo in pripete datoteke se sme uporabljati v
skladu s pogoji druzbe Mobitel, d. d. Glej: http://disclaimer.mobitel.si/
This e-mail and its attachments are subject to the Mobitel, d. d.
disclaimer. See: http://disclaimer.mobitel.si/
*
Ken Durling
Composition and Music Services
Berkeley, CA
[510] 843-4419
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
