Yes you are right Ken, but one alternative to this is software correction for the "distortion". I've read about some great software titles that very easily remove those charcteristics. I don't know which are best but I'm sure there are users here that could point you in the right direction.

Kyle



Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: EOS 1.6 w/a Q
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:52:31 +0000

Thanks Cotty and Henning -

I'm pretty much following you - been chewing on it. Forgive me, this is the first time I've really tried to get a grip on this question. I think I do understand what is discussed in Mike's article.

Let me rephrase the question: in 35mm format my favorite w/a is 24mm, not just because I like the FOV, but also because for me it's the widest lens that still looks "normal" - wider lenses seem to me to call attention to themselves as sort of "special effect" lenses. I think even in a rectilinear lens, there's a lot of keystoning, pincushion and various other linear alterations. Maybe "distortion" is the wrong word.

So, on a 1.6 format camera, to get the same FOV as a 24mm I need to use a 15mm lens, but on a 35mm camera a 15mm lens is practically a fisheye. If I take a photo in 35mm with that lens and then crop it in PS by 1.6, those stretched lines are still evident.

Therefore what I'm understanding - and help me out here - is that the same thing is going to happen on a 1.6 DSLR, that 15mm lens is still going to be a 15mm lens with all its innate characteristics, and the only way I'm going to get a photo similar to the one I take with a 24mm on my 35mm is with a FF DSLR.

AND, if that's true, is all of the above also true with lenses whose image circle has been adjusted for the small sensor, as in EF-S lenses?

Thanks for bearing with me here.


Ken


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to