>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/29/06 09:52AM >>>

Let me rephrase the question:  in 35mm format my favorite w/a is 24mm, not just 
because I like the FOV, but also because for me it's the widest lens that still 
looks "normal" - wider lenses seem to me to call attention to themselves as 
sort of "special effect" lenses. I think even in a rectilinear lens, there's a 
lot of keystoning, pincushion and various other linear alterations.  Maybe 
"distortion" is the wrong word.  

So, on a 1.6 format camera, to get the same FOV as a 24mm I need to use a 15mm 
lens, but on a 35mm camera a 15mm lens is practically a fisheye.  If I take a 
photo in 35mm with that lens and then crop it in PS by 1.6, those stretched 
lines are still evident.  

Therefore what I'm understanding - and help me out here - is that the same 
thing is going to happen on a 1.6 DSLR, that 15mm lens is still going to be a 
15mm lens with all its innate characteristics, and the only way I'm going to 
get a photo similar  to the one I take with a 24mm on my 35mm is with a FF 
DSLR.  
>>>>

What you're referring to is "perspective distortion". This is caused by the 
relation/ratio of distances from objects to the lens, i.e. the magnification of 
near objects vs far objects.
To make a close object appear the same size when using a wide angle lens as 
when using a longer lens, you need to be closer to it. However, the background 
is now proportionately farther away and is rendered at a much lower 
magnification, causing the distortion. The opposite type of perspective 
distortion is "telephoto compression", where shooting from far away make the 
relative magnification of widely spaced objects nearly the same.

So in short, all that matters is angle of view and lens to object distances. If 
you were to take a picture of the same scene using 15mm and 24mm lenses 
_from_the_same_place_, a crop from the 15 would look just like the 24.






N.B. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached 
documents is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure.  If you 
are not the intended recipient, please note that any review, disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this electronic message or any 
attached documents is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact 
the sender and delete the material from any computer.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to