Ken Durling wrote:
So when you say the 17-40L isn't "tack sharp" - can you elaborate? is that just wide open? Can you overcome it by stopping down? I'm considering one for my 30D, and don't presently have the budget for a 16-35. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Ken, It's a sharp lens, but not as sharp as the 70-200mm F2.8 IS L lens. This could be the particular one we tested. There can be some variance between lenses, maybe he just got one that is not as sharp as others. Peter K. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
