David Jurney wrote:
My 5D arrived yesterday and today it has assumed its rightful place in
my camera bag, but to make room I am now without my beloved 620 in the
bag for the first time in nearly nineteen years. The 620 was a great
camera. Even with my EOS 3, I still shot a lot with the 620 and it
never let me down. Somehow, I doubt that I will be shooting with the 5d
a quarter of the time the 620 was with me.
On another note...
Question: has anyone on this list done a comparison of the 24-105mm
f/4L with the 17-40mm f/4L? I am curious as to how they perform at
their common focal lengths. I would assume the 17-40mm f/4L would
perform better, but I am curious about any real world comparisons.
David
*
You'll have to let us know how you like the 5D.
I felt a bit like you when I got my 20D and the EOS-3 started seeing
less and less use.
This is not a comparison between the 24-105 but an interesting item on
the 17-40.
<http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/canon-17-40.shtml
This was posted a few weeks ago when Tom P was looking for comparisons of the
16-35 and the 17-40
Enjoy the 5D,
Bob
--
/////
( O O )
--------------------oOOO-----O----OOOo-----73 de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curiosity killed the cat although I was a suspect for a while........
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
