On 7 Feb 2007 at 16:32, Fred Salzer wrote: > Although I'm a lurker, I thought I'd contribute this. > > "Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting" > <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html> > > Fred
http://fmf.fwn.rug.nl/~anton/topposting.html http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_chr0.htm http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm http://www.geocities.com/nnqweb/nquote.html http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting.html http://www.html-faq.com/faq.php?clue=topposting http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt http://www.malibutelecom.fi/yucca/usenet/brox.html http://www.newsreaders.com/ http://www.planefacts.ndirect.co.uk/group/advice/ http://www.star-one.org.uk/computer/format.htm http://www.usenet.org.uk/ukpost.html#s3 http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/quot_ord.txt http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/quoting.txt Or, my favorite: A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Bye, Willem-Jan Markerink The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the inability to understand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!] * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
