On 7 Feb 2007 at 13:10, Ken Durling wrote:
> At 12:14 PM 2/7/2007, you wrote:
>
> >But I do notice that you are (again) a prime example of excessive
> >quoting, due to reverse-quoting, so I suspect many of your bounces
> >are triggered by that....;))
>
> Well, I will try to correct this, although I thought I was selective
> in my quoting, but am not clear which way is "reverse." I just
> reviewed several dozen posts by various people and they seem to be
> coming through regardless if their new text is before or after the
> quoted text. Is this really why mine are bouncing? And is there
> some cut-off amount as to how much text can be quoted before it
> starts to bounce? I really want to solve this.
There is no punishment/filtering on reverse-quoting (putting the
reply above the original), only on the inclusion of the admin-footer,
which is a sure sign of sloppy-quoting (and one that is triggered by
this reverse-quoting in the first place, in 99.9999% of all cases).
But that is mostly because creating a proper filter aginst reverse-
quoting would become rather complex....;))
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
