Pattie Anderson wrote:
On 6/5/07, carla ruigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all, perpetual lurker here. I have a EOS film and first generation
digital, d60. I have a couple of telephotos, the 75-300 lens, and the
75-300 IS lens, as well as 2 shorter zooms. I have a desire for a
current
opportunity for a longer lens, and am wondering whether it would be
better
to pair one of my telephoto's with a converter, or go for the 100-400.
I occasionally use a Tamron 1.4x teleconverter with my 70-200 f/2.8L
and especially my 300 f/4L (both non-IS) lenses. While I wouldn't
want to blow any of the resulting images up to poster size, IMHO the
image quality is pretty good. Although I must admit I have had my eye
on the 100-400 for some time.
Pattie
I started with a 75-300 and now have the 100-400L. If you can afford it, get the
100-400L! The image quality with a 100-400L is far superior to the 75-300 (&75-300 IS).
Plus, adding a teleconverter to a 75-300 disables auto-focus.
Rob
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
