On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:22:39 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi all! > > This weekend I took a closer look at our wishlist and added a bunch of > (IMHO) popular Fedora packages still missing in EPEL. Then I wrote a > little script that emailed all the owners and co-maintainers asking them > for their EPEL plans regarding the package in question; to track that I > added a status column in the wishlist. See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/WishList > > I plan do to that again now and then in the future -- so if you want to > see a package in EPEL just add it to the wishlist with the status > "unknown" -- then my script (when I run it) will send a mail to the > maintainer. > > There are a few packages on the wishlist where the Fedora owner does no > participate in EPEL. And takers for them? Here's the list: >
> || libsidplay || Commodore 64 music player and SID chip emulator library > || Why is it on the wishlist? Just because some other packages use it? If anyone has interest in packaging libsidplay2 instead [for Fedora or EPEL], feel free to add me as a reviewer. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
