On Mi Dezember 12 2007, David Lutterkort wrote: > But if it were rubygem-activerecord and rubygem-activesupport, that > would be ok, too ? I'd rather include the rubygems than the straightup > packages.
I do not really know, does | require 'active_record' work, when only rubygem-acvtiverecord is installed, but not ruby-activerecord? Then I guess it would be ok, too. :-) Regards, Till
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
