On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:58 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > I requestet these packages. I use them with a ruby camping[1] application, > which is a framework like rails, but much more simplier. Therefore I would > not need rubygem-rails.
But if it were rubygem-activerecord and rubygem-activesupport, that would be ok, too ? I'd rather include the rubygems than the straightup packages. David _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
