On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/18/2016 05:57 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> Can we not just have an updated gcc package in EPEL? It wouldn't be >> hard to make one. Or do we have to not conflict with whatever Red Hat >> might put in one of their addons? Even then it would be easy to avoid >> both file and package name conflicts. >> > > I don't see why not (we only promise to not conflict with a couple base > channels), though I'm willing to believe that it would be hard, especially > for EL6. devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done, so it seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL itself would be to reduce the number of repos during build time. In my opinion that's not a big enough advantage to justify all of the work that would be involved.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
