On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:21:24 +0100
Karanbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 22/08/16 18:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>>> "DJ" == Dave Johansen <[email protected]> writes:  
> >   
> > DJ> devtoolset is designed to do all of this and is already done,
> > DJ> so it seems that the only advantage to putting it in EPEL
> > DJ> itself would be to reduce the number of repos during build
> > DJ> time.  
> > 
> > So is devtoolset something I get access to as a CentOS user?  How
> > do I build these packages myself (i.e. in mock)?  
> 
> you should be able to 'yum install centos-release-scl' on a CentOS
> Linux machine and get access to all the SCLs

Yeah, but if we enable that for EPEL builds, we are going to get all
SCLs right? So, people could start depending on them at runtime instead
of just install time. 

I'm not opposed to devtoolset, but I don't think we want to allow
runtime scls without actual scl guidelines. 

kevin

Attachment: pgpaA3DqsuudX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to