WOW, I in NO way intended to "talk down" to anyone in this group... HELL NO!
In fact I HATE that kind of "posturing." This model is just a wee bit
"esoteric" BUTT ("...and it's a big BUTT, Simone!" - sorry you gotta be a
fan of Pee-wee Herman to get this obscure attempt at levity/humor), BUTT, we
are giving it "our best" to make it "exoteric." The language used, is often
given to "example" *because* of the broad spectrum of "familiarity" with
this kind of model... but hell yea, *you're right!* >>* It ain't "rocket
science"* and the *only* reason it took *us* 20 years of research, is 'cause
we're a tad bit slow on the "uptake." No, it is for this reason that we are
absolutely convinced that we *cannot* be the only group out there with a
completed model. We are just the only one fool-hearty enough to bring it out
for public perusal. I hope this helps to ameliorate any misgivings about the
approach we've adopted. It's just that I've felt it necessary to bring some
members who've displayed "kneejerk reactionism" to task... so maybe it seems
I've been a bit severe in my treatment of them. NO, I do NOT lump the
membership. I'm assuming these are just the frustated "thought-police"
trying to control what is "acceptable fodder" for their psuedo-intellectual
exploits> one of your members called them "Hyjackers?" maybe it was you? -
couldn't have said it better! Sorry Adrian, I will *try* to explain any of
your questions as time allows AND I hope that you can forgive any lapses in
trying to cover the spread of familiarity... yes, much of this WILL BE
"prima facie" for you, but you must remember that you're probably in the
90th percentile and my group's efforts are aimed at *whoever* shows
interest... not just the "gifted." Again. sorry if I unintentionally
bruised any intellectual sensibilities of yours. LATER< TJM
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:28 PM, adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Timothy, post us urls, urls, urls, SOME of us don't like getting things
> dished out in selective
> dribbles. I am quite able to handle intuitve stuff, understand systems
> theory quite well thank
> you but don't think its the be all and end all. Your octahedral model is a
> copy of a way to
> model earth magnetic field so that's no great shake. Just don't falsely
> generalise from SOME
> idiots that they are all idiots. Nor think of it as a great secret only fit
> for the elected.
> adrian
>
>
> ornamentalmind wrote:
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Epistemology" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
